Wildlife causes problems in urban environments
As cities grow, often they encroach on the natural habitats of potentially dangerous animals.
October 15, 2014
Written by Derek Prall
Rapid urban expansion has some big-city residents coming face to face with an unforeseen consequence – lions and bears.
A mountain lion known as P-22 has been living in central Los Angeles’ Griffith Park for years, according to Urban Carnivores, an online zoological resource. Although the creature has not caused problems, its presence has made some Los Angelinos wary.
Watch the video below of the mountain lion stalking through the park.
Bears, too, have been a problem in urban environments. According to the Journal of Zoology, bear populations in urban Nevada are three times higher than their historical baseline, and the animals are concentrating more in urban areas than undeveloped ones.
Medium-sized carnivores including red foxes, coyotes, badgers and raccoons not only survive in cities but also have managed to exploit food sources and shelter to their advantage, achieving higher population densities than are found under natural conditions, according to the Journal of Zoology. In addition, although they may not live permanently within cities, large carnivores such as bears and wolves benefit from living near urbanized areas.
Unfortunately, this often creates problems. According to Next City, when humans and animals share space, conflict often follows in the form of animal-vehicle collisions, damage to property, the spread of disease and attacks on pets and people. Most urban animal control policies go no further than trap and kill; however, these tactics are often ineffective.
But Boulder, Colo., has taken a different approach. According to Urban Wildlife Management Plan materials, the city has worked to increase public awareness about coexisting with animals and strategies to minimize human-wildlife contact and conflict.
These strategies, according to city materials, include properly disposing of garbage, being mindful of outdoor pets and “hazing” certain animals – or scaring them off with loud sounds or squirting them with water.
“In the long run, we’ll only be able to conserve biodiversity on our planet if we can make cities into places where humans and animals can coexist,” Seth Magle, a Colorado-based urban wildlife ecologist told Next City. By focusing on co-habitation rather than extermination, he hopes urban environments can benefit all creatures.
_____________
To get connected and stay up-to-date with similar content from American City & County:
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Watch us on Youtube