Register to attend the Local Government Summit: Bridging the gap: Managing and delivering innovative public services

On-Demand Webinars

Fighting Fraud
Learn strategies to help guard against financial and reputational risk.

Mitigating IT Infrastructure Risks
Learn how to better control IT failure — especially during emergencies.

More Webinars

Featured White Papers

Branch Office Consolidation for Local Government
Combining branches and their IT technologies without a plan for adapting the IT infrastructure can be difficult, complicated and expensive.

Branch Office Consolidation for Public Safety
Learn how public safety organizations can keep their IT systems and local-area networks up and running — and keep the public secure.

More White Papers

Municipal Cost Index

The Municipal Cost Index, developed exclusively by American City & County, is designed to show the effects of inflation on the cost of providing Municipal services.

Municipal Cost Index graph

View the Municipal Cost Index and other indexes

American City & County analyzes and concisely explains important issues facing cities, counties and states.

Get the latest information on government trends, policies, best practices and case studies.

Subscribe Now

Behind the curve

Business intelligence from Web 2.0 applications can deliver strategic information, but are local governments using the information they collect effectively?


       

As more city and county governments experiment with better engaging residents and driving them to their central websites, many are asking how well the technology is delivering on its promise. Fortunately, most Web 2.0 applications come with built-in metric tools that enable public managers to gauge real-time use. The information might include overall use, use by area, time of day, number of postings and activities, subjects covered, and more.

While gathering business intelligence is somewhat new for local governments, businesses have been using the information for years to measure customer satisfaction and engagement. Considering that resident satisfaction and engagement is more critical than ever, some cities and counties also have been creative in developing and using technologies that bring greater transparency and engage residents in a variety of ways through web-based applications and devices, like smartphones.

To better understand where city and county governments are going on the road to Web 2.0 and business intelligence, Washington-based Public Technology Institute (PTI) and American City & County surveyed technology-minded public managers throughout the nation. The questionnaire was short, simple, yet at the same time captured valuable data and insight.

For example, when asked if their system captured use and traffic metrics from their Web 2.0 applications, more than three-quarters of the respondents (77 percent) say they do not capture metrics, and 22 percent report they do. Of those who collect metrics, 66 percent say they issued routine internal reports and shared them throughout the organization. Another 14 percent say they publish those reports on their website for the public to see.

Of the 77 percent of respondents who do not use metrics from their Web 2.0 applications, only 20 percent say they planned to implement metrics in the next 12 months. When asked why metrics from their Web 2.0 applications were not used, almost half (49 percent) say they "do not have the skilled staff to effectively utilize," or "no one at the senior levels seems to care" (43 percent).

Of those who gathered information, most collected basic information, such as page views , unique visits, traffic, duration of visits, browser types, domain names and tracking of applications that accept payments, such as traffic tickets or business license fees.

Do you currently have a system to capture usage and traffic metrics from your Web 2.0 applications?
Yes 23% (32)
No 77% (106)
If you do have a system to capture usage and traffic metrics from your Web 2.0 applications in place, do you issue routine internal reports or share this information with your organization?
Yes 66% (19)
No 34% (10)
If you do have a system to capture usage and traffic metrics from your Web 2.0 applications in place, do you disseminate these reports/information to the public via your website?
Yes 14% (4)
No 86% (24)
If you currently do not have a system to capture usage and traffic metrics from your Web 2.0 applications, do you plan to implement a system within the next 12 months?
Yes 20% (20)
No 80% (81)
If you do not have or plan to use Web 2.0 metrics please select the reasons why (select all that apply):
Do not have the skilled staff to effectively utilize 49% (34)
No one at senior levels seem to care 43% (30)
Other, please specify 17% (12)
Too time consuming 13% (9)
Too complicated to implement 9% (6)
Believe it may violate privacy policies or laws 7% (5)
Source: Web. 2.0 Metrics and Business Intelligence in Local Government: 2010

Judging by the survey results, most city and county governments are missing an opportunity to capture useful data using tools that often are available as part of the Web 2.0 service or application. Using those tools, government officials can demonstrate the value of social media by determining which videos have been reviewed and how long, or which applications have been used the most and when. However, like any tool, the data the tools capture is only good if it is properly used.


Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.

Register now for HP's "Mitigating IT Infrastructure Risks" Webinar
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010

Browse Back Issues