Utah's recently passed "Utah State-Made Firearms Protection Act" seeks to exclude from federal regulation firearms and "firearm-related items" that are made in the state exclusively for use in the state. The bill, sponsored by state Sen. Margaret Dayton, is meant to challenge the U.S. Supreme Court's "expansive interpretation of the federal Interstate Commerce Clause and assert Utah's authority under the U.S. Constitution to regulate wholly intrastate commerce," according to Gov. Gary Herbert's office.
Do states have the right to exclude products made in their state only for local consumption from federal regulation?
Please send your responses to Ed Brock at edward.brock@penton.com. Include your name, title and the organization with which you work. American City & County will print some of the responses.
Read how readers responded to the January Platform question: Should public employees pay more for health insurance if they smoke or are overweight?
